January 27, 2005
Motion Picture Academy calls grassroots Passion petitioners "Zealots"
Passion for Fairness is the home of a petition that was designed to get the attention of the members of the Motion Picture Academy (AMPAS) and to get them to consider Mel Gibson's
The Passion of the Christ in their Oscar nomination process.
Patrick Hynes from AnkleBitingPundits.com received a particularly nasty reply from one Stephen Norris representing the Academy though.
I am utterly delighted that our Academy of Motion Picture Art and Sciences has chosen not to yeild to the Bullying of you Christian Zealots to award this mediocre film just because it deals with your particular religious beliefs.
Rather snippy, ain't he?
Perhaps Stephen would like to deal with his own zealous beliefs, as opposed to condemning others.
Posted by: mhking at
10:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 1 kb.
Somebody took the BK "Chicken Fight" ad seriously?

More proof that state legislators, nationwide, are completely unhinged.
A state legislator in Oklahoma wants to revive the state's cockfighting industry by (get this) putting tiny, poultry-sized boxing gloves onto roosters.
You heard me -- and wait, it gets better. State Senator Frank Shurden wants to add chicken-sized vests to the roosters, in order to track punches in order to score the bouts.
The Oklahoma legislature outlawed the blood sport in 2002 because of its cruelty to the roosters, which are slashed and pecked to death while human spectators bet on the outcome.But State Sen. Frank Shurden, a Democrat from Henryetta and a long-time defender of cockfighting, said the ban had wiped out a $100-million business.
To try to revive it, he has proposed that roosters wear little boxing gloves attached to their spurs, as well as lightweight, chicken-sized vests configured with electronic sensors to record hits and help keep score.
"It's like the fencing that you see on the Olympics, you know, where they have little balls on the ends of the swords and the fencers wear vests," said Shurden. "That's the same application that would be applied to the roosters."
Notice Shurden's party affiliation -- he's a Democrat.
Sounds like a career in national politics might be in the offing for him, once he's done in Oklahoma. After all, "idea men" like him are where US Congresscritters and Senators come from -- at least for the moonbats.
Posted by: mhking at
04:38 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 259 words, total size 2 kb.
1
It's unbelievably amazing that someone this ignorant could not only exist but be a senator. If there is anything we can do to participate in getting rid of this proposed law, please let us know.
Thanks, Justin
Posted by: Justin and Naomi at February 07, 2005 03:41 PM (tCjPB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 26, 2005
Entire radio morning show staff suspended over tsunami slurs
The entire staff of the WQHT Hot 97 Radio morning show in New York City was
suspended indefinitely this afternoon, after an ongoing uproar over a bit the show's staff did to the tune of "We Are The World."
The bit ridiculed victims of last month's Indian Ocean tsunami disaster in the most vile terms, including racial slurs and with crass jokes about children watching their parents die.
"What happened is morally and socially indefensible," said Rick Cummings, president of Emmis Radio. The station is owned by Emmis Communications Corp ."All involved, myself included, are ashamed and deeply sorry. I know the members of the morning show are truly contrite. They know their actions here are inexcusable," Cummings said in a statement.
The piece used racial slurs to describe people swept away in the disaster, made jokes about child slavery and people watching their mothers die.
"You can hear God laughing, 'Swim you bitches swim,'" was one line in the song, sung by staff of the show to the melody of the 1985 famine relief song "We Are the World."
The station declined to say when host Tarsha Nicole Jones, known on the air as "Miss Jones," would return to the air, or even if she would at all.
Here's hoping that she doesn't. What they did shouldn't pass for humor, but unfortunately, in today's society, there are those who would find their song funny.
Posted by: mhking at
09:41 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Ms. Info made it clear that she wasn't a part of it and didn't agree with it. She shouldn't have been suspended unless it's because of the on air argument between her and Ms. Jones
Posted by: DarkStar at January 27, 2005 03:52 PM (cnw1A)
2
I think what happened on the miss jones show is just a small part of how radio shows have become disrespectful. Because the people put up the disrespect that these shows have given for so long they seems not to care what they do and who they hurt just to get a cheep laugh. I think is time for some changes, and these radio host should be thought a lession. what happen to those people was a tragedy and we need to come together and pray for the nation.
Posted by: Debbie at January 28, 2005 05:57 AM (92n9Y)
3
I'm glad they were suspended but we need to look a little further into why some fool thought this song would be funny. A lot of young black people in NYC are not only anti Semitic but anti Asian. Where the heck did that come from?
Posted by: kimberley at January 28, 2005 12:23 PM (6krEN)
4
I believe that Miss Jones is getting everything that she deserves I have been listening to the station for a while, and have said time and time again she is going to say the wrong thing. And look she did not prove me wrong.. Let her stew in her mistake that way she can build a heart for someone to think that shit was funny has no HEART. Having her come back will now solve the issue...
Keep her off the air
Posted by: tooty at January 28, 2005 05:43 PM (BMN8F)
5
What is going on with buju was he involve with bogle's death and if so, that's so fucked up because i am a jamaican and buju was the one that "BUST" Bogle with a very popular song called "bogle a run the place night and day".Get the facts right and let me know peace, keep it jiggi
Posted by: Dave at September 26, 2005 04:28 PM (ywZa8)
6
I think so. I think your article will give those people a good reminding. And they will express thanks to you later.
Posted by: best range hoods reviews at July 07, 2012 02:46 AM (t2NYp)
7
I am impressed by the quality of information on this website. There are a lot of good resources here. I am sure I will visit this place again soon.
Posted by: convertible crib at July 07, 2012 02:47 AM (t2NYp)
8
This is a really good read for me. Must agree that you are one of the coolest blogger I ever saw. Thanks for posting this useful information. This was just what I was on looking for. I'll come back to this blog for sure!
Posted by: convection microwave oven at July 07, 2012 02:47 AM (t2NYp)
9
Hi my loved one! I wish to say that this post is awesome, great written and include approximately all significant infos. I would like to look more posts like this.
Posted by: indoor dog gates at July 07, 2012 02:47 AM (t2NYp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Blogger gets attention from MSM on Hallums video
Jawa Report's head jawa, Rusty Shackleford, is getting some
attention from the mainstream media behind the release of the Hallums video by terrorists in Iraq early yesterday.
In the past 24 hours I've gotten e-mails from producers at Fox News, CNN, NBC's Today Show, and several regional newspapers. Why me? Google.Has Google become the foundation for MSM research? I certainly hope not.
That's how I do research.
So, tell me again why the MSM is superior to blogs?
Bloggers have become the vanguard of the new media. Many talk show hosts have embraced the format. Many newspeople publicly disdain the pajamahadeen (though, I suspect that they secretly read as many of our pages as they can get their grubby little paws on). The executives try to ignore us and hope we'll get tired and go away.
They do so at their peril.
Our presence continues to grow, and we become the "go-to" guys as time moves forward. Even though some of us might wear bathrobes and fuzzy slippers as we blog.
Posted by: mhking at
05:36 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 186 words, total size 1 kb.
January 25, 2005
Boxer: "Waaaaa! Rice attacked me!"
After going on a temper tantrum against Secretary of State-designee Condoleezza Rice, Senator Barbara Boxer (Drooling Crybaby-CA) is unbelievably
claiming that Rice verbally attacked her.
"She turned and attacked me," the California Democrat told CNN's "Late Edition" in describing the confrontation during the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing."I gave Dr. Rice many opportunities to address specific issues. Instead, she said I was impugning her integrity," Mrs. Boxer said.
According to the transcript and the aired video as shown on all the news networks and C-Span, Boxer was the one on the attack. Rice simply wouldn't stand still and play "punching bag" to Boxer's lazy attempts to verbally assault her.
"I personally believe — this is my personal view — that your loyalty to the mission you were given, to sell this war, overwhelmed your respect for the truth," Mrs. Boxer told Miss Rice, who has been President Bush's national security adviser since 2001.Miss Rice responded that she "never, ever lost respect for the truth in the service of anything. It is not my nature. It is not my character."
"And I would hope that we can have this conversation and discuss what happened before and what went on before and what I said without impugning my credibility or my integrity," Miss Rice said.
Like I said the other day, Boxer got caught in her own lie, and is trying to backpedal and make certain that her lies stick in the media.
It won't work, Senator. And you continue to look more and more like a raving lunatic, and less an honorable statesman, the more you keep munching on your shoes.
The full Senate is taking up the Rice confirmation today.
Posted by: mhking at
10:37 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 290 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Barbara Boxer looks and sounds like a crazy aunt.
Posted by: random prose at January 25, 2005 09:41 PM (L/b8L)
2
Yeah, poor lil ole white girl........got beat up by the mean black girl in her own back yard. Boohoo.
I wish they all could be cal-ah-fornia girrrrrls!!! Whiney ass.
Posted by: Beau at January 26, 2005 07:40 AM (GpmN8)
3
More and more it seems that the mask is coming off of the Democratic Party.
Posted by: Getting My Mind Right! at January 26, 2005 01:50 PM (jca3+)
4
Barbara Boxer, while a congressman, brought Anita
Hill to get Clarence Thomas. If you are black and not left-wing Democrat, she hates you. Yes our intelligence was wrong, but which senators
gutted the CIA and DIA for twenty plus years.
If the military side is wrong, that is the Pentagon's fault and not hers. The cartoons are
disgusting from so-called liberals. She is highly
intelligent 50-year-old woman whom the trio of
Biden, Kerry, and Boxer tore apart.
Posted by: James M. Barber at January 26, 2005 05:32 PM (9qhgG)
5
Barbara Boxer is the worst excuse for a Senator on Capitol Hill. Mind you, this is not a partisan statement, but a matter of fact.
Senators from both sides of the isle have been beating up witnesses before Senate Committees longer than anyone can remember. Boxer, not to her credit, has been the first Senator to lose a sparing match in a Senate committee in probably at least five decades.
It takes a special quality to be on the sure-fire winning side of the table, and then lose, as did Boxer. It is the quality of a bona-fide loser.
Boxer should retire.
Posted by: Neo at January 30, 2005 04:02 PM (uQU0D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Backwards, forwards, it still looks like a hooker special
Readers over at
Wizbang took a look at the catalog for the dress designer and insist that the
NY Post got it backward. Literally.
The claim is that the dress was worn backward by the model, and that it should have been worn the other way.

But upon further investigation, the dress catalog also has the prom dress shown as worn by the model in the Post article to begin with -- except in black.

Either way, it still looks like it belongs on a hooker, as opposed to my 16 year-old daughter.
Maybe if I have her wear a burlap sack that goes from the neck to the ankles.
Or perhaps a convent. I wonder if I can get a shotgun from Wal-Mart on short notice...
Posted by: mhking at
10:09 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Good post, Mike, especially the last two sentences. We need more father's like you around, especially in the black community. Did I go there? Yes I did.
Posted by: LB at January 25, 2005 03:03 PM (ybj3R)
2
I am always amazed at people's willingness to spend lots of good money on clothing that looks like it was made from the scraps on the designer's sewing room floor.
Posted by: Samantha at January 25, 2005 05:41 PM (Ihkjb)
3
Like I told my daughter, if she'd wanted to wear something like that to her prom, she'd still be locked in her room, and she's 27 now. I miss taffeta, don't you?
Posted by: Denise at January 26, 2005 12:04 AM (6krEN)
4
Go fug yourself- a very amusing blog site that makes fun of fashion victims descibed this dress
"a complete break with fashion reality" among other things. I'm 34, and while I would kill to have a body that could wear a dress like that, I would hope someone would kill me before letting me even try it on. My dad would beat me and I'm 34.
Posted by: Libragirl at February 04, 2005 04:39 PM (FUThX)
5
AS a parent of a teenager, I would not let her wear any dress event close. But here is an idea-- Why don't the parents and teenagers that object to this dress sent the company a petition so that would understand that not everyone thinks this is a good dress.
Posted by: Alice Everage at February 24, 2005 03:48 AM (xfTFc)
6
eFox-shop.com offers brand new products
which are directly purchased from various reputable manufacturers throughout
the world. Thanks to our sophisticated and vertically integrated supply chain
system and Afterbuy-System, we guarantee you will be receiving the highest
quality product at the lowest price. www.efox-shop.com
<a href="http://www.efox-shop.com">www.efox-shop.com
</
Posted by: dual sim at July 26, 2010 12:12 AM (+VXuV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"F 9/11" gets ZERO Oscar nominations

Nominations for the Academy Awards were named today, and in a rare moment of clarity, the nominations included
a big fat goose egg for Michael "Fathead" Moore's propaganda flick "Fahrenheit 9/11."
Fathead claimed that he'd get a nomination for the film, which did it's level best to slander the Bush Administration during the 2004 Presidential Campaign.
And like most of America, the Motion Picture Academy didn't buy it.
The Oscars will be handed out February 27 on ABC. The show will be hosted by Chris Rock.
Posted by: mhking at
06:05 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 98 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think it's a shame that "Passion of the Christ" wasn't nominated for bigger awards. Yes the score is hauntingly beautiful, but so is the movie. I think if they hadn't gotten their noses out of joint because it wasn't a "Hollywood" movie, more of them would have seen it and it would have been in the top five.
But I am thrilled about MM being shut out. A big skunk for the big skunk.
Posted by: Denise at January 26, 2005 12:06 AM (6krEN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bad guys release video of US hostage

American contractor Roy Hallums, believed to have been kidnapped in November, was
shown on a video released this morning by Islamist terrorists holding him captive in Iraq.
On the tape, Hallums pleads for his life.
"I have been arrested by a resistance group in Iraq," 56-year-old Hallums, dressed in civilian clothes and his beard flecked with white, says on the tape."I'm asking for help because my life is in danger because it's been proved that I work for American forces."
As he speaks, the barrel of an assault rifle is held inches from his head. Unlike other tapes made by militants of hostages seized in Iraq, no flags or banners of an organization appear in the picture and no demands are made.
"I'm not asking for any help from President Bush because I know of his selfishness and unconcern to those who've been pushed into this hell-hole," Hallums says.
"I am asking for help from Arab rulers ... so that I can be released as quickly as possible from this definite death."
No demands were released with the tape.
CNN's Christiane Amanpour says that there is no indication as to when this tape was produced. Hallums and four co-workers were kidnapped last November 1.
Hallams is from Westminster, CA, and according to Rusty Shackleford at The Jawa Report,
Bad words against Bush?? This does not sound like the Roy Hallums as described to me by his family and friends. I'm sure the rifle pointed at his head had something to do with his pleas.Further, the intervention on the part of Ghaddafi may be a hidden plea for money. Robert Tarongoy, the Fillipino abducted with Roy, was released reportedly after ransom was paid. How else could Ghaddafi help??
Rusty has been on top of this and other kidnappings as they have taken place. He initially posted word of the Hallums kidnapping in November.
Hallums' family in California has put together a support website, and are asking donations be sent to:
Free Roy Foundation
Hallums Family
PO Box 947
Westminster, Ca. 92684
Posted by: mhking at
05:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 379 words, total size 3 kb.
Four pair of long overalls would better for my daughter

Would you let your daughter wear something like this to the prom?
This dress, advertised in Seventeen Prom, YM Prom and Teen Prom magazines is a hot seller this year, according to an article in this morning's New York Post.
"I was shocked when I first saw it, but now it's one of our top 20 dresses nationwide," says Nick Yeh, the CEO of Xcite, the Stafford, Texas, company that designed the dress and some 200 other styles this season."I have a 15-year-old daughter and, no, I would not recommend she wear this dress.
"As a businessman," he adds, "I'm not judging what a teenager should wear or not wear. It's up to the parents to decide for their own children."
In fact, some shops in smaller cities require girls to bring in parental permission slips to buy the dress, Yeh told The Post.
You got that right, and I'll be damned if'n my 16 year-old daughter would even get to think about wearing something like this.
The dress runs $495, and comes in red and black.
Beware, parents. Beware.
I've got an even better suggestion that will be even better: Put her in four pair of long overalls. Until she's 30.
Posted by: mhking at
05:23 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 222 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The dress is on backwards, see the posting on http://www.freewillblog.com/index.php/weblog/comments/5066
however, my daughter would not be wearing it even if it were the right way around.
Xcite CEO Nick Yeh's attitude is what is wrong with America today. I'll sell anything regardless of morality as long as it makes me a buck!
But then again, it is one of the top 20 selling Prom dresses, therefore there must be some parents who don't mind their daughter's clothing say: "Hey I don't mind if you look at me as a cheap sexual object, it is all I have to offer."
Posted by: Scott at January 27, 2005 07:58 AM (cW8ZP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 24, 2005
"Sheets" Byrd ain't as smart as he tries to be
I suppose Senator Robert Byrd (KKK-WV) might take offense at this. Then again, he seems to be at home pulling the sheets over people's eyes; he just might like it.

Posted by: mhking at
04:31 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Michael, thanks for the heads up on the day by day's latest.
I just finished blogging about Ole Sheets and I thought I'd drop by to see what my other favorite bloggers where saying about Byrd's petty attempt to derail Condi Rice's appointment.
Jim
Posted by: Getting My Mind Right at January 24, 2005 06:22 AM (ugW+H)
2
Amazing how the dummocrats protect an old bigot like this yet call us conservatives racists. This guy is not fit to be even in the same room as Ms. Rice. How dare he take the lead in delaying her appointment.
Posted by: BobG at January 24, 2005 02:15 PM (4Tr+k)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 23, 2005
Boxer: "I'll call Rice a liar again."

US Senator Barbara Boxer (
Stark Raving & Drooling Lunatic Moonbat-CA)
said today that she would repeat charges that Secretary of State-designee Condoleezza Rice deliberately lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
"I will lay out again on the Senate floor [why] I do not believe [she] has been candid with the American people," Sen. Boxer told CNN's "Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer.""[She's] gone on shows like yours and made statements that I don't think were true, or they were half-true, didn't tell the whole story, didn't level with the American people."
Reacting to criticism from White House chief of staff Andy Card, who called her attacks on Rice last week "petty politics," the Marin County Democrat taunted, "Even though Andy Card would like me to go away, I'm not going to go away."
"[Rice] said things that were flat-out not true," Sen. Boxer continued. "When she said only one agency thought the aluminum tubes could not be used for nuclear weapons, that wasn't true."
Boxer's ravings were shown as lies and half-truths by posters across the blogosphere (
including me) last week.
Boxer has some sort of personal grudge; in the eyes of some, she figures she's less vulnerable than most liberals, since she was just reelected to a six-year term by her constituents in California.
Posted by: mhking at
05:35 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Rachel Lucas said it best (from memory): "I was just waiting for Condi to answer Boxer's questions, with the real answer, followed by
'Got it? Bitch?'"
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 23, 2005 05:45 PM (L9A/j)
2
Barbara Boxer is a idiot! She wouldn't know the truth if it hit her in the face.
Posted by: Getting My Mind Right at January 23, 2005 07:31 PM (xOuqd)
3
I watched the first round of confirmation hearings, and Boxer just struck me as frickin' stupid. She was nowhere near Condi Rice's level. It was sort of like a 5 year old ranting at their parents.
I was, however, very impressed with Obama's questioning.
Keep up the great work mate!
Posted by: random prose at January 23, 2005 09:04 PM (tvFRc)
4
We in the blogospere need to keep the spotlight on Babs and remind everyone what a pernicious bitch she is. You, sir, are doing a great job of that! Keep it up.
Posted by: BobG at January 24, 2005 03:49 AM (DVC1F)
5
It's all a part of the political game. I don't see why people are upset when it means nothing.
Democrats have already said she will be confirmed.
Posted by: DarkStar at January 24, 2005 03:20 PM (cnw1A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Goodnight, Johnny.

Johnny Carson
1925-2005
We missed you long before you were gone...
(More coverage from
Wizbang,
LaShawn Barber,
Pajama Hadin,
Short Family Online,
LGF,
Free Republic,
DC Thornton,
Argghhh!,
Diggers' Realm,
Rooftop Report,
Barking Moonbat, and lots of others, including most of my blogroll)
Posted by: mhking at
09:01 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
1
RIP Johnny. The Tonight Show was actually funny when he was on the air.
Posted by: kimberley at January 23, 2005 09:28 AM (+7VNs)
2
I grew up watching Johnny. It was a right of passage of sorts when you were able to stay up to see him anytime you wanted. He has been missed for sometime now...but there was always that thought in the back of your head...wondering if he would come back just one more time (if only to guest host). Hear the new gig he has now, has one stellar guest list.
Posted by: Guy S. at January 23, 2005 12:54 PM (JHj4Q)
3
Johnny was the best by a wide margin.
Posted by: BobG at January 23, 2005 01:10 PM (4cWxS)
4
Johnny Carson
Nearly five thousand times
He came out upon that stage
And in entertainment’s history
He wrote a very unique page.
He also "made" many a star
And launched some great careers
And everyone who was someone
Was his guest throughout those years.
Some twenty thousand people
Sat across him in the "chair"
He made them all feel welcome
And he really seemed to care.
He had his own brand of humor
Making funny, what was not
An honest, too good Entertainer
And what you saw is what you got.
Millions of us stayed up late
To see what he had up his sleeve
And now, that show is "really" over
And we are all left here to grieve.
And those who didn’t "know" him
Before he left that stage in Ninety-two
Will never know how much they missed
Now that his time on Earth is through.
But there will be a "Tonight Show"
Forever, somewhere up on high
As Johnny welcomes all those Stars
Who have passed this World by.
Del "Abe" Jones
White Bluff, TN
January 23, 2005
Posted by: Charles D. Jones at January 25, 2005 10:39 AM (JXz8g)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 21, 2005
"ALLAH FUBAR!!!"
Wizbang and
Rooftop Report have been all over this VW "commercial" since word of it surfaced.
The ad, a hoax viral ad not unlike last year's Ford Ka web ads that depicted a cat being beheaded and a pigeon being smacked into the street, is making it's way across the internet. The spot shows a man stepping out of a house in a nameless cosmopolitan European city and getting into a black VW Polo (a European-only sedan, similar to the American VW Golf).
After driving the Polo through the city, he stops in front of a sidewalk cafe packed with diners. Inside the car, you see that he is a suicide bomber with a bomb vest on and a detonator in his hand.
Outside the car again, the bomb detonates, and is completely contained within the car. A muffled "whumpf" sounds as the car remains intact. One diner looks up at the car casually.
The captioned tag reads, "Polo. Small but tough."
The ad plays on the established tagline for Volkswagen's Polo model, "small but tough". It shows a man in fatigues setting off in his Polo. He arrives outside a restaurant and pulls out a trigger. However, when he detonates the bomb, a flash is seen inside the car but the car itself does not explode. The strapline appears at the end. The campaign is the work of a duo known for their spoof advertising, called Lee and Dan. The pair run a website, LeeandDan.com, but the ad does not appear on the site at the time of writing. They have worked on a string of legitimate ads including Ford StreetKa, BP and Casio G-Shock, among others. Dan, from Lee and Dan, said: "The ad got out accidentally and has spread like wildfire. It wasn't meant for public consumption. "We think the spot reflects what people see in the news everyday, and in this instance the car is the hero that protects innocent people from someone with very bad intentions. We're sorry if the ad has caused any offence." Volkswagen stressed that the spot, which has been doing the viral email rounds this week, was made without any involvement from the company whatsoever. DDB London was also not involved in the spot.
It might be in bad taste, but as far as I'm concerned, it's certainly funny as hell!
Oh. And you can watch the ad here, or watch it here.
Posted by: mhking at
04:16 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 405 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Agreed. I hate to say it, but it is pretty stinking funny. Good call.
Posted by: Steve at January 21, 2005 05:31 PM (qUGze)
2
Funny, the first time I saw it I almost choked, I was laughing so hard. Those two have no apologies to make, they only have to make more.
Posted by: Mike H. at January 21, 2005 10:07 PM (FCfM4)
Posted by: DarkStar at January 22, 2005 06:46 AM (cnw1A)
4
Oh dear. I have to share this one with half the free world now ...
Posted by: Kate at January 23, 2005 12:21 AM (EwaGN)
5
Yer right. Very bad taste. But, *chortle* *snort*
BWAHAHAHAHAAA!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 23, 2005 05:35 PM (L9A/j)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Terrorists behead Iraqi policeman in broad daylight
The bad guys are getting bolder and bolder with their attacks.
According to a Kuwait News Agency (KUNA) report today, they decapitated an Iraqi policeman in front of shocked onlookers on a Baghdad street today.
Witnesses said here Friday that a number of gunmen beheaded a policeman and stuck a note on his corpse describing as traitors those working with or helping the police.About ten gunmen in two cars in the Ramadi area stepped out of their vehicles, attacked a soldier, tied his hands behind his back, and cut his head off before the eyes of shocked onlookers in the street, the witnesses said.
Do these animals have no shame?
And we're stuck with moonbats here worrying about the terrorists and how they are treated.
Just damn.
Posted by: mhking at
08:45 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Absolutely insane. How can murder be induced in people so easily? Exactly what does it take to convince a group of people that beheading somebody in public is honorable? Sick sick sick.
Posted by: Steve at January 21, 2005 05:39 PM (qUGze)
2
Let's get one thing strait...I think both the left and the right can agree that these beheadings and terrorist attacks are terrible things, and that those who do them are terrible people.
That being said, it's not fair to say that "we're stuck with moonbats here worrying about the terrorists and how they are treated."
I'm assuming you're speaking about liberals, specifically Democrats...well I think that they should be treated reasonably. We don't have the right to abuse and torture them, and they don't have the right to do it to us. And the people in Guantanamo Bay aren't even terrorists necessarily...they're suspected terrorists or supporters of them. The problem comes in when we hold them indefinitely without pressing charges. If we find that they are guilty we can punish them, but we can't just keep them locked up without giving them a chance to prove their innocence.
This public beheading is a tragedy, as were the ones before it, but do not think that just because liberals want rights for the detained that we condone what these obvious murderers are doing.
Posted by: nextbigthing at January 22, 2005 05:37 PM (e9ktT)
3
This is not only a war on terror, it is a war on Islamic fundamentalists who hate America, Western culture, and for that matter, the entire Western World. They declared this war, and they drew first blood. It is indeed a "Jihad" and the U.S. history goes back to 1979 when the Shah was deposed in Iran.
Get it straight - The Swedish Chef and his kitchen staff didn't crash planes into the WTC, Muslims did, and it down't matter what country they were from. It is radical Islam that we're fighting.
Here's the bottom line. Every time someone whines about the fate of the Guantanamo detainees, enemy resolve is boosted. Every time a liberal politician slams Bush, the enemy loves it.
They are irrational and deluded. They continue to fight because they erroneoulsy believe that the majority of Americans understand and support their cause.
The Guantanamo detainees would just as soon tie YOUR hands behind your back and cut your head off with a dull knife. Believe it.
Posted by: Groundskeeper at January 27, 2005 02:07 AM (VAjGE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Is his name Bond...James Bond?

Is this face of the new James Bond?
According to insiders, it is.
6'6" Scottish actor Rory McCann is the unknown that is reportedly the top choice of producers of the as-yet-untitled 21st James Bond flick, set to be filmed later this year or early next year.
McCann may be known peripherally to American audiences for a part in Oliver Stone's much-panned Alexander this year, and for a role known to PBS/BBC America viewers of Monarch of the Glen. McCann has recently finished filming in Beowulf and Grendel, due to be released stateside later this year.
The previous Bond, Pierce Brosnan, was let go by EON Productions late last year, when they indicated they wanted to go in a "new direction" with the Bond character. The Hollywood Reporter has all but confirmed that Goldeneye director Martin Campbell will direct "Bond 21" as well.
Posted by: mhking at
07:14 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 153 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Guy S. at January 21, 2005 01:18 PM (/0bzw)
2
Hugh firms to be next 007
23jan05
AUSTRALIAN Hugh Jackman is favourite to become movie world's next James Bond.
British bookmakers Ladbrokes and William Hill have cut their odds to 2/1 on the likelihood of Jackman taking over from Pierce Brosnan.
It would make Jackman the second Australian after George Lazenby to play secret agent 007.
Clive Owen has had his odds cut by both bookmakers after his Golden Globe-winning role in the film Closer.
William Hill has him in third place -- behind Star Wars' Ewan McGregor -- after Sunday's awards at 4/1, down from 8/1. Ladbrokes has cut his odds from 14/1 to 8/1 after the win for best supporting actor.
Earlier favourites included Colin Farrell, Colin Salmon, Dougray Scott and Eric Bana.
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,12018519%255E2902,00.html
Posted by: Patrick at January 22, 2005 04:52 AM (eoWr9)
3
As long as it's NOT Hugh Jackman or that cow eyed English actor, Rupert somebody. This guy actually looks a little like the real Bond, Sean Connery. Now if they can just get a decent script, get the right woman to play Moneypenny, find a good looking Bond girl, toughen up M and get the rights to Casino Royale we'll be good to go.
Posted by: kimberley at January 23, 2005 09:32 AM (+7VNs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 20, 2005
Hail to the chief!

Newly sworn in, Bush offered an implied rebuttal to critics of his foreign policy and the war in Iraq. "Some, I know, have questioned the global appeal of liberty," (President Bush) said, "though this time in history, four decades defined by the swiftest advance of freedom ever seen, is an odd time for doubt.""We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom," he said in remarks that were shorn of all but the most glancing references to the dominant political issues of the day.
The spread of freedom and liberty were the oldest ideals of America, Bush said. "Now it is the urgent requirement of our nation's security, and the calling of our time."
President Bush was
sworn into his second term at noontime today on the front steps of the Capitol. Ailing Supreme Court Chief Justice Williiam Rehnquist delivered the oath of office on a cold Washington day that left no doubt that the Republicans were in charge.
The US Senate, in an afternoon session, will take up cabinet appointments. Though Democratic Senator Robert Byrd (KKK-WV) suggested late yesterday that he would stall a vote on Bush' s choice for Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, until sometime next week -- a blatantly transparent swipe at the President, designed to let the Administration know that Senate Democrats are still engaging in open warfare with the White House.
Posted by: mhking at
08:22 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
January 19, 2005
Boxer gets caught in her own lie

Senator Barbara Boxer (Raving Moonbat-CA), in her zeal to try to attack Secretary of State-designee Condoleezza Rice during confirmation hearings on Capitol Hill yesterday,
falsely insisted that WMD was the only thing that Congress voted on when authorizing military action in Iraq.
BOXER: Well, you should read what we voted on when we voted to support the war, which I did not, but most of my colleagues did. It was WMD, period. That was the reason and the causation for that, you know, particular vote.
Boxer has been so enamored by the notion of attacking the Administration that she obviously didn't do her homework before spouting her lies.
Boxer failed to note that seven different points were included in the authorization, contrary to her insistance otherwise.
To coin a phrase, let's go to the videotape!
1. Iraq's harboring of Al-Queda terrorists
2. Iraq's support for International Terrorism
3. Iraq's "brutal repression" of its citizens
4. Iraq's failure to repatriate or give information on non-Iraqi citizens detained and captured during Gulf War I, including an American serviceman;
5. Failing to properly return property wrongfully seized during the Kuwait invasion
6. The attempted assassination of former President Bush in 1993
7. America's national security interests in restoring peace and stability to the Persian Gulf
Mind you, this does not include the enforcement of the United Nations resolutions (that everyone from the Left to the UN itself seems to so conveniently forget in their ongoing endeavor to attack this President and this Administration).
In other words, Boxer either had a lapse of memory or she just plain lied.
But then again, as I've said before, a lie told enough times becomes the truth in the minds of those who are apt to believe it. And Boxer has shown that the left plans to continue to tell as many lies about this President and this Administration as possible in order to make him look as bad as possible, and enhance their own standing.
Posted by: mhking at
04:47 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 354 words, total size 3 kb.
1
If you count up the 'WHEREAS' clauses in the authorization resolution, congress itself gave TWENTY-THREE different reasons for going to war.
The Democrats really blew it this time: saying that there was only one reason for war, and that Condi's refusal to concede the point demonstrates her loose relationship with the truth, is not only provably wrong but also demonstrates that Senator Boxer is the one with the loose relationship with the truth.
Posted by: Ursus at January 19, 2005 08:18 AM (Ejs7a)
2
I don't say this lightly, but I think that she has to be the DUMBEST senator that I have seen in my entire life!
Posted by: Steven J. Kelso Sr. at January 19, 2005 03:11 PM (U4SDZ)
3
What's up with Democrats "talk" to have THE Black votes," so, why do Ranking Dems severely pick on EVERY minority person President Bush nominate? Recall:black female Judge nominee,the Hispanic and now Rice. ALL my black friends voted BUSH!
Posted by: Jeanne Wimbley at January 20, 2005 06:06 PM (xIQKr)
4
Actually,
3.Iraq's "brutal repression" of its citizens is covered by U.N. SC Res 688.
Posted by: Neo at January 21, 2005 10:55 AM (FWm03)
5
Well, it's obvious that the Bush administration emphasized the existence of WMDs. The support to go to war would have been considerable decreased if Bush hadn't lied and said that they had proof of weapons of mass destruction. They also distorted the truth in other ways, including the tubes that were "only suitable for making nuclear weapons" and the "traveling chemical labs"...oh, the tubes were only potential shells for regular missiles, and the "labs" were for creating hydrogen for weather balloons...
of course, they had this information...the CIA gave them documents offering both an assenting and dissenting opinion as to what these things could be, but the administration chose to downplay the dissenters in order to make their plans justified and a "threat" seem imminent...
please do not presume to call progressive senators dumb and liars when our conservative president obviously distorts the truth and even has trouble giving simple speeches without making up words or using improper grammar...
Posted by: nextbigthing at January 21, 2005 06:45 PM (aKFHi)
6
The Bush administration used the available information at that time like you stated
""""of course, they had this information...the CIA gave them documents offering both an assenting and dissenting opinion as to what these things could be, but the administration chose to downplay the dissenters in order to make their plans justified and a "threat" seem imminent...""""
plus the testimonies from various sources and testimonies including people such as Bill Clinton, Kerry Dog face, and whole bunch of liberals from previous administration, after all, Bush was in office for only about a year. You idiots liberals convinienntly forgot about the facts. THe CIA was also led by the people from previous administartion. So I could conclude that the Bush admin was misled by the Clinton's people.
***Now go and check on all the facts and fuck youself or your dog after all your a whining bitch.***
Posted by: fuckUnextbigthingbitch at January 21, 2005 11:19 PM (02elr)
7
You are obviously too dense to see my point. The point is that the administration had two different options. They could either acknowledge that there was the possiblity that there weren't any weapons and that they didn't have "irrefutable evidence" that there were WMDs, or they could lie and say that there were weapons and they had absolute proof and it couldn't be anything else. Well, obviously they chose the latter.
And we didn't actually go to war in Iraq until 2003...Bush had been in office for more than a year...wait, let me help you out with this one....Bush was elected in the 2000 election, took office in 2001...we went to war in 2003...
watch this, it's like magic...
2003-2001=2 years
That's right...did you see what I did there? It's called subtraction...
And one more thing...I would go fuck my dog, but your mom's busy tonight...give her my best though...
Posted by: nextbigthing at January 22, 2005 05:29 PM (e9ktT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 18, 2005
Rice politely tells Senate Dems to shove it

Secretary of State-designee Condoleezza Rice, testifying in today's confirmation hearings before a Senate subcommittee,
got testy with several Democrats who seemed intent on attacking her character.
California Democrat Sen. Barbara Boxer argued that the Bush administration had shifted its justification for the war because it had failed to find stocks of biological and chemical weapons it had asserted were there."You sent them in there because of weapons of mass destruction. Later the mission changed when there were none," Boxer told Rice. "Let's not rewrite history, it's too soon to do that."
"It wasn't just weapons of mass destruction," Rice told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, saying former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein supported terrorism, attacked Kuwait and Israel and needed to be removed given the new U.S. threat perception after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington.
"We can have this discussion in any way that you would like, but I really hope that you will refrain from impugning my integrity," Rice told Boxer. "I really hope that you will not imply that I take the truth lightly."
Boxer wasn't the only moonbat to go after Rice during today's testimony, as Delaware Democrat Joe Biden and former presidential candidate John Kerry (Moonbat-MA) took their shots.
"We must use American diplomacy to help create a balance of power in the world that favors freedom," Rice told the committee. "And the time for diplomacy is now."Biden shot back: "Despite our great military might we are in my view more alone in the world than we've been in any time in recent memory. The time for diplomacy, in my view, is long overdue."
"We went in to rescue Iraq from Saddam Hussein, now I think we have to rescue our policy from ourselves," added Sen. John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who failed to unseat Bush. "I don't take any joy in this but it's ... the reality we've got to deal with. We've got kids dying over there."
It sounds like Ketchup Boy is still sore over losing the election, and wants to take it out on whomever he can. Mind you, he's still spouting his untruths about disenfranchised voters in Ohio and playing the martyred sore loser.
Though Rice's confirmation is all but assured, Senate Democrats have tossed veiled threats at the Republican leadership regarding White House nominees over the past few weeks, most notably over the possibility of the nomination of conservative Supreme Court jurist Clarence Thomas to the Chief Justice position on the retirement of ailing current Chief Justice William Rehnquist.
Provided the GOP leadership on the Hill gets some backbone about themselves, this won't be the headache that it currently looks to be shaping up as.
Posted by: mhking at
10:55 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 466 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Ultimately, the Senate has to get rid of the arcane, unconstitutional, undemocratic filibuster.
Only in the US Senate can a determined minority thwart the will of the majority, not as a shield in protection of the minority's rights, but rather as a sword. It's wrong; it should go.
Posted by: Tony Iovino at January 19, 2005 04:17 AM (PSRRr)
2
We usually have a better system than the Mexican Revolution times; however, just IMAGINE a brick wall, a firing squad and Demon after Demon receiving the justice they want sane and decent people in Iraq, Iran, Darfur and North Korea to receive.
Makes you think of Boxer, Murray, Biden, Fatty Teddy and other Michael Morons doesn't it?
Posted by: leaddog2 at January 19, 2005 07:14 AM (WH270)
3
I heard more than I could take. Boxer was mean and vicious, Biden was condescending, and Kerry smiled while being rude. They lost the presidential election plus House and Senate. She(Dr. Rice) acted unset and sometimes looked it, while being attacked by Biden, Kerry, and Boxer. Boxer said she lied without using the word! Robert Byrd talked for 14 hours forty years ago to stop civil rights legislation and lost, according to a computer search! Every person put forth will be attacked including judges and other cabinet members. A vacant Supreme Court space will probably come up this year even though I hope recovery by the Chief Justice. Thomas was derided by Reed. A male conservative is bad, but a black female conservative is worst.
James M. Barber
Posted by: James M. Barber at January 22, 2005 02:55 PM (9qhgG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Cobb school board appeals evolution sticker decision

In a 5-2 vote last night, the Cobb County School Board
voted to appeal the decision of US District Judge Clarence Cooper, which would force the removal of a controversial sticker from science books in the county.
Cooper's decision insists the sticker, which reads "This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered," violates the "Establishment Clause" of the US Constitution, which maintains the so-called separation of church and state.
On the heels of the school board vote, the board issued a statement which indicated that they felt "condemned . . . for taking a reasonable approach to address the concerns of citizens on a controversial issue."
The disclaimers stem from a petition drive begun in 2002 by Marjorie Rogers, who described herself during testimony in November as a creationist who believes the Bible's book of Genesis is factual. Rogers collected 2,300 signatures from supporters, prompting the board to print the disclaimers on stickers and place them in 13 science books used in middle and high schools.Six parents sued to remove the stickers saying the disclaimers violated the principle of separation between church and state. Cooper heard three days of testimony, plus closing arguments, in November. He issued his ruling Thursday.
The board's decision Monday flabbergasted Jeffrey Selman, the leader of the parents who sued. "They're ludicrous," he said. "They're ignoring the ruling."
Board Chairwoman Kathie Johnstone read the board's statement aloud Monday, although both she and Laura Searcy voted against the appeal. Johnstone, the only one of seven members not on the board when the disclaimers were written, said she personally felt "it's time to move on."
"I'm worried about the toll it will have on the district," she said.
Board members said they would pursue the appeal at no additional cost, a promise stemming from board attorney Glenn Brock's pledge to do his remaining work on the case for free. Brock's law firm has charged the board roughly $74,000 so far.
Brock said he would request a stay either today or tomrrow on the judge's decision, pending the appeal.
My major beef with the issue has been addressed already, and that's the additional expenditure that we as Cobb County taxpayers would be saddled with, thanks to this entire process. Brock's firm won't be adding to the tax burdon with the appeal -- based on that, my feeling is that the appeal should move forward. There is no logical reason that the Judge Cooper should intervein in this matter - the stickers do not endorse any one theory of creation over another; it only suggests that the generally accepted theory is not the only one.
Or are the parents who filed the suit so afraid of a challenge to their own theories that they feel a zeal toward defending their theory? An almost religious zeal, perhaps?
Posted by: mhking at
10:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 504 words, total size 3 kb.
This is wrong on at least six levels -- even for Bill Gates
Bill Gates, sporting his "come hither" look, and looking more like a child molester, showed up in a 1985
Teen Beat spread.
I wonder if the future Mrs. Gates had a copy...


Posted by: mhking at
08:22 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I wonder if the future Mrs. Gates had a copy...
What do you think sealed the deal?
Those puppy dog eyes & the way he tosses those 5 1/4 floppies.
Posted by: BH at January 18, 2005 10:46 AM (Ki9Ww)
2
Now THAT'S some funny stuff....
By the way, Michael....My son did have his surgery finally and he's doing well....
You can even see pics
HERE
Thank you once again for your prayers and well-wishes....
Posted by: CrzyDJM at January 19, 2005 01:16 AM (GSdIn)
3
Bill: "Come on, let's do it on my desk while I write binary all over your body in chocolate then spank you with my manual as you caress my hard drive."
I am scared of those pics, wtf was he thinking, spread out on that desk, like he was some center fold for Nerdgirl Magazine, with that come hither stare, inviting all chicks to touch his floppy.
Teen Beat, hahahaha!!
Posted by: Staci at January 19, 2005 03:35 AM (oKKoQ)
4
Heh. I remember those floppy disks. MicroSoft donated thousands of extra blanks to my High School and I ended up with hundreds of them.
Also, look at the curves on the monitor. Amazing how things used to look.
Posted by: King of Fools at January 19, 2005 06:54 AM (ktIW6)
5
That is too funny for words!
Posted by: Brainster at January 19, 2005 12:46 PM (CxBVU)
6
Another good thing about floppies...
Remember when AOL was small enough to fit on a floppy? I used to love getting those disks in the mail 'cause it was a free disk, basically...You formatted it and then you had an extra disk...
Now if they'd only start sending out AOL on CD-RW's instead of CD-ROM's....
Posted by: CrzyDJM at January 21, 2005 01:19 AM (GSdIn)
7
That's very, very...disturbing. Ugh. I bet it took hours to sanitize that desk.
Posted by: Steve at January 21, 2005 05:36 PM (qUGze)
8
On the other hand these pictures probably did much good. I'm sure that after looking at them many of Tiger Beat's readers decided on virginity at least until graduation.
Posted by: kimberley at January 23, 2005 09:34 AM (+7VNs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
96kb generated in CPU 0.3117, elapsed 0.6016 seconds.
56 queries taking 0.5722 seconds, 195 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.